3.9 million women want justice over non consultation of the raising of 66 pensionable age · Change.org (2024)

URGENT UPDATE & CALL TO ACTION

Florida Bear Kill Bill Passes!!!

On 3/7/2024, HB 87 "Taking of Bears," passed the final floor vote and is now en route to Governor DeSantis.

Act now, contact Governor DeSantis, and respectfully request that he VETO HB 87 "Taking of Bears." You can simply ask Governor DeSantis to VETO HB 87 "Taking of Bears," or you can explain why you want the bill vetoed. Please feel free to use the information on our petition and our petition updates as reference points. When calling, please wait on the line until your call is answered. The mailbox has been full. You can also send an email. If emailing, be sure to put VETO HB 87 "Taking of Bears" as your subject title.

Phone: (850) 717-9337Email: GovernorRon.Desantis@eog.myflorida.com

To everyone who called, gave testimony, signed our petition, and emailed lawmakers, we appreciate you and thank you for your advocacy.

Stay tuned for more updates and calls to action!

_______________________________________

This petition serves as written opposition to House Bill 87 (HB 87) - Taking of Bears and Senate Bill 632 (SB 632) - Taking of Bears.

We, the undersigned,strongly oppose House Bill 87 (HB 87) - Taking of Bears, and Senate Bill 632 (SB 632) - Taking of Bears, which would enable a person to kill a Florida Black Bear because they "feel" threatened. These bills open the door for people to claim self-defense in instances where bears are not a threat. They override the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FWC) authority to investigate crimes committed against this protected species (black bears) if the person claims they felt threatened.

UPDATE: The verbiage of "feels threatened" was changed to "reasonably believes one's life is in danger," Which is essentially the same thing. The bills now include property. Provisions that stated one could not lure or provoke a bear were removed.

*There is no burden of proof that an individual has to provide to substantiate the claim that they reasonably believed their life, or a loved one's life (pets included), was truly in danger.

If a bear poses a threat to you or your loved ones (pets included), you have a right to self-defense, currently covered under the Common Law Defense of Necessity. This law allows you to act in self-defense against any wildlife. It doesn't differentiate between protected wildlife and unprotected wildlife. The difference between these two bills (HB 87 - Taking of Bears and SB 632 - Taking of Bears) and the Common Law Defense of Necessity is that HB 87 and SB 632 remove the capacity for law enforcement to investigate and prosecute individuals who unjustifiably kill black bears.

*** UNDER LAW, YOU ALREADY HAVE A RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE.***

Last year in Sanford, FL, a man shot a bear that he says charged at him and his dog. According to the FWC. He did not get in any trouble because it was deemed self-defense. Click here to learn more.

HB 87 and SB 632 will allow people like John Anthony Falango (the Sebring Bear Killer) to avoid prosecution for killing bears without justification.Click here for more info about this case.

These bills promote a false narrative that bears are overpopulating and threaten human safety. The increase in bear-human conflicts in some regions of Florida, like Franklin County, is due in part to the failure of people to remove bear attractants and adequately secure their trash. Seminole County, which once ranked highest in bear-human conflicts, has seen a significant reduction since implementing bear-resistant trashcans. The FWC previously stated they saw a 95% reduction in bear-related incidents in a Volusia County neighborhood since the introduction of bear-resistant trashcans. Bear-human conflicts will continue to rise until the root causes are addressed (unsecured trash and other attractants). If we apply common-sense measures such as bear-resistant trash cans, securing garbage until morning pickup, and removing attractants such as birdfeeders, we can resolve these issues and prevent future incidents. These methods have proven successful worldwide.

Click here for an easy, cost-effective way to make your trashcan bear-resistant.

The proposed bills state that people cannot lure or provoke a bear. Anyone who were to kill a bear also cannot keep it or sell it afterward; rather, they would have to turn the bear’s body into the FWC within 24 hours.

The problem is these bills override the FWC's authority to investigate, so an individual will not have to prove they acted in self-defense and didn’t lure a bear onto their property. In areas where conflicts are present, the bears are already being lured onto private property, whether directly or indirectly, by trash and other bear attractants.

The truth is that black bears are not overpopulating and pose no significant threat to human safety. Floridablack bears are predominantly vegetarian, with 80% of their diet consisting of plants, 15% insects, and only 5% animal matter, usually carrion. They are not the voracious man-eating carnivores that the people who wish to kill them would like you to believe. In fact, since recorded history, no one in the State of Florida has ever been killed by a black bear. Since 1900, only 61 people in North America have been killed by black bears.

Unprovoked bear attacks are extremely rare. According to bear expert Lynn Rogers, Ph.D. of the North American Bear Center, you are 45 times more likely to be killed by a dog, 120 times more likely to be killed by bees, and 60,000 times more likely to be murdered by another human being than to be killed by a black bear.

Florida black bears are a keystone species. Their presence positively impacts the environment and other species they share it with. They disperse more seeds than birds, meaning they quite literally influence the types of plants that grow in the forest. The vitality of a healthy functioning ecosystem depends upon the existence of bears.

Wildlife is a public trust, and we, the people, have a right to defend animals for the benefit of those living today and future generations. Bears should not be killed because some humans refuse to take preventative measures when it comes to bear-human conflicts.

The public, as the beneficiary of the trust, has the right to ensure that its trust is being respected. The public's overarching interest in the preservation of its trust assets may not be overridden by the complaints of homeowners who have failed to take appropriate steps to secure their trash, by beekeepers who have failed to employ cost-effective fencing around their apiaries, by drivers who collided with bears while speeding, texting, or talking on a cell phone, by hunters upset that bears have been raiding their deer-baiting stations, or by uneducated people who have never been taught that a bluff charge is a black bear's way of asking for space and respect, not an act of aggression.

SB 632 and HB 87 are considered antithetical to conservation principles for several reasons.

These bills are neither focused nor equipped to meet the extraordinary challenge of conserving Florida’s wildlife species and ecosystems. Conservation, in the context of environmental science and wildlife management, refers to the careful management, protection, and sustainable use of natural resources, including wildlife, forests, water, and habitats, to ensure their long-term viability and health. Conservation aims to strike a balance between human needs and the preservation of ecosystems and biodiversity for future generations.

House Bill 87 - Taking of Bears and SB 632 - Taking of Bears fail to address the issues at the heart of all bear-human conflicts. They choose violence over non-lethal solutions, undermine the jurisdiction of the FWC, and ignore the current law that exists to protect those acting in self-defense.

For all the reasons aforementioned, we, the undersigned, respectfully request that you vote NO to House Bill 87 - Taking of Bears and SB 632 - Taking of Bears.

For questions and inquiries, you can contact us directly at contact@oneprotest.org.

___________________________________________________________________________

OneProtest

Bear Defenders

Instagram

Photo credit: Chris Norcott Photography.

3.9 million women want justice over non consultation of the raising of 66 pensionable age · Change.org (2024)

FAQs

How much will waspi compensation be? ›

DWP Housing Benefit 2024

The recommended compensation ranges between £1,000 and £2,950, although this is significantly less than the £10,000-plus that campaigners had hoped for.

What is the Waspi summary? ›

Separately to the legal challenge, the WASPI campaign encouraged women born in the 1950s who felt they had not been adequately informed about increases to their SPA to make complaints of maladministration, first to DWP's Independent Case Examiner (ICE) and then to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).

When can I retire if I was born in 1964? ›

Those born after 5 April 1961 will reach the new State Pension Age of 67 on their 67th birthday. Those born after 5 April 1977 will be impacted by the State Pension Age rise to 68. As always with investments, your capital is at risk.

What is the retirement age in the UK for men? ›

State Pension age is currently 66 years old for both men and women but will gradually increase from 6 May 2026. Do I get my State Pension automatically? No – you have to claim it. See page 8 for more information about how to do that.

Who gets the waspi compensation? ›

Who could be entitled to state pension compensation? The Waspi group (Women Against State Pension Inequality) has been campaigning for those born between April 6, 1950, and April 5, 1960. If you were born within these dates, then you might be entitled for compensation but no decision has been made just yet.

Which state pays the highest pension? ›

Telangana is the only state in the country which offers Rs 3,016 per month to differently-abled people and Rs 2,016 pension to eligible beneficiaries above 57 years of age, Finance Minister T Harish Rao said on Sunday taking a dig at the BJP alleging the saffron party is promising Rs 3,000 pension if it won the ...

What is the highest State Pension for a woman? ›

The full level of the State Pension is £221.20 a week in the 2024/25 tax year, which gives an annual income of £11,502.40. This may be lower depending on when you reached State Pension age and your National Insurance record.

What was the female pension scandal? ›

Campaigners claim that almost 4 million women born in the 1950s had their retirement plans “plunged into chaos”, with many of them left thousands of pounds out of pocket after the DWP increased the state pension age from 60 to 65, and then to 66.

Who has the highest pension age? ›

Greece is among the countries with the highest retirement age in the world: 67 for men and women. Workers can claim full pension benefits only if they have contributed to the pension plan for at least 15 years (equivalent to 4,500 working days). Denmark, Iceland, Israel, and Italy also have retirement ages of 67.

What happens when Social Security runs out? ›

Reduced Benefits

If no changes are made before the fund runs out, the most likely result will be a reduction in the benefits that are paid out. If the only funds available to Social Security in 2033 are the current wage taxes being paid in, the administration would still be able to pay around 75% of promised benefits.

Is 65 no longer retirement age? ›

The milestone still marks the point at which individuals become eligible for Medicare coverage. But for Social Security benefits, the full retirement age — when a qualifying worker is eligible for 100% of the benefits they earned — is moving to 67 for anyone born in 1960 or later.

What is the earliest age to retire with Social Security? ›

You can receive Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62. However, we'll reduce your benefit if you start receiving benefits before your full retirement age. For example, if you turn age 62 in 2024, your benefit would be about 30% lower than it would be at your full retirement age of 67.

What is the retirement age in Germany? ›

Currently, the retirement age in Germany is 66 years and applies to people born in 1958. This will reach 67 by 2031.

What is the retirement age in Canada? ›

The standard age to start the pension is 65. However, you can start receiving it as early as age 60 or as late as age 70. If you start receiving your pension earlier, the monthly amount you'll receive will be smaller. If you decide to start later, you'll receive a larger monthly amount.

What is the retirement age in Australia? ›

67 years

What is a typical pension payout? ›

The median private pension benefit of individuals age 65 and older was $11,040 a year. The median state or local government pension benefit was $24,980 a year.

What is the average pension gain? ›

At Penfold, our most popular plan has seen an average yearly growth of 4.6% from inception to September 2023. Using a 5% average, a monthly contribution of £250 over 40 years could see your pension grow to nearly £200,000, thanks to the magic of compounding. Remember, in the world of pensions, time is your ally.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Last Updated:

Views: 6418

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Refugio Daniel

Birthday: 1999-09-15

Address: 8416 Beatty Center, Derekfort, VA 72092-0500

Phone: +6838967160603

Job: Mining Executive

Hobby: Woodworking, Knitting, Fishing, Coffee roasting, Kayaking, Horseback riding, Kite flying

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Refugio Daniel, I am a fine, precious, encouraging, calm, glamorous, vivacious, friendly person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.